Description |
How conducted |
Pros |
Cons |
In-tray |
Participant is left with his/her 'predecessors' in-tray and must sort through various items, prioritising them and taking or delegating action.
Forms the core of many development centres. Materials in the in-tray are often used to build on the background information to give the participants more data about the company and its issues. |
- Tests participant's ability to manage time, organise, plan prioritise and delegate.
- Is usually carried out between other exercises as a 'desk task' - is therefore flexible.
|
- Is usually completed and handed in at the end of the day and requires marking by observers in the evening.
|
Written task |
Participant is asked to develop a business initiative, solve a problem or put together a strategic plan, etc. in a written report.
Can often form part of the In-tray exercise, or may be separate and run before a formal development centre. May also form the subject matter of an assessed presentation. |
- Tests the participant's strategic and/or problem solving ability as well as written communication skills.
- Need not be run in parallel with the development centre: for example, could be completed by participants (and assessed) in advance of a day of other exercises.
|
- Can be time-consuming and may not simulate an actual job requirement.
- Unless lap-tops are provided, handwriting can be a problem for participant and observer.
|
Staff briefing |
Participant delivers a briefing to 2 -4 four role-players, each representing a member of the participant's new team or other company employees. |
- Tests leadership and communication skills as well as ability to motivate others.
- Can also be adapted to test delegation and implementation skills.
- Role-players can be briefed to ask specific, scripted questions.
|
- Needs role-players at a junior level (actors, students or company members).
|
Competency based interview |
An observer interviews the participant using behavioural questions based on organisational competencies. |
- Gives the participant an opportunity to relate 'real world' experiences and achievements.
|
- Not strictly an 'exercise' as the interview is based on 'on the job' performance. This is the participant's take on his /her own performance, and may contradict evidence gained in centre exercises.
- Time consuming (1-2 hours is the norm).
|
Presentation |
Participant delivers a strategic briefing or briefing on a business topic to observers who role-play board members, senior colleagues, etc. |
- Good test of participants strategic or 'big picture' ability and acumen.
- Observers can ask questions of participant after briefing to gain further insight into participant's ability.
|
- Participant can be hampered by poor presentation skills.
- Takes time to prepare, depending on type of visual aids/presentation style used.
|
Two-on-one role-play |
A simulated meeting between participant and two peers or two direct reports to resolve a dispute or differing views, such as an allocation of fees or commission, use of resources. |
- Good test of ability to mediate and settle disputes but at the same time, focus on solving the problem in contention.
|
- Depends on the skill of the role-player and ability to stick to script.
- Also the ability of the role-players to keep their arguments moderated and not be tempted to over-act!
|
Group Discussion or Teamwork Exercise |
All participants (sometimes split into smaller sub-groups) discuss a fixed topic while observers watch. Alternatively, they engage in a group activity that calls for management, leadership and communication skills as well as decision-making. |
- Good test of interactive skills, action orientation and ability to work with a team.
- Can also test decision-making, depending on nature of activity.
|
- Some members can dominate and others retire.
- Can be a challenge to observe.
|
Tests |
Assessment of personality, motivators, numeric or verbal ability.
360 degree profiling. OPQ, NMG, VMG, etc.
(Some can be completed on-line) |
- Are provided by external parties to ensure consistency.
- Many can be done on-line before the centre, so saving time.
- Provide useful supplementary information that can help position feedback.
- Psychometric tests are normed against peer groups.
|
- Will add to the cost as they are provided by third parties.
- Can give supplementary information only, some are self-reported questionnaires.
- Observers need to be trained and licensed to give feedback. (Talent International Development Ltd's observers are trained to give SHL OPQ feedback).
|
One-on-one role-play |
Simulated meeting/interview with subordinate for recruitment, coaching, performance management, problem solving, resolving a critical incident. An observer or actor can role-play and there may be an additional observer watching the action.
Instead of subordinate, the role-player could be a customer, JV partner or supplier.
Can be an urgent telephone call instead of face to face role-play. |
- Flexible: subject matter of the meeting can be adapted to test most competencies.
|
- Depends on the skill of the role-player and ability to stick to script.
- Observers, employees, trainees or professional actors needed as role-players.
|